"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2018-06-21T14:59:48Z"
data-video-section="business"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/cnnmoney/2018/06/21/supreme-court-rules-states-collect-taxes-out-of-state-online-sales-nr.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="supreme court rules states collect taxes out of state online sales nr"
data-first-publish-slug="supreme court rules states collect taxes out of state online sales nr"
data-video-tags="business and industry sectors,business, economy and trade,electronic commerce,government and public administration,government bodies and offices,internet retailing,joe johns,online and home shopping,politics,public finance,retail and wholesale trade,sales tax,state supreme court,taxes and taxation,us federal court system,us federal government,us state governments,us supreme court"
data-details="">
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2018-06-05T12:22:31Z"
data-video-section="us"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2018/06/05/colorado-baker-supreme-court-ruling-reaction-today-sot-newday.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="colorado baker supreme court ruling reaction today sot newday"
data-first-publish-slug="colorado baker supreme court ruling reaction today sot newday"
data-video-tags="belief, religion and spirituality,colorado,comcast corp,companies,gays and lesbians,lgbt rights,marriage,nbc,nbcuniversal,north america,population and demographics,same-sex marriage and unions,sex and gender issues,societal issues,society,southwestern united states,united states,weddings and engagements"
data-details="">
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2018-06-04T14:35:25Z"
data-video-section="politics"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/06/04/supreme-court-same-sex-wedding-cake-case-ruling.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="supreme court same sex wedding cake case ruling"
data-first-publish-slug="supreme court same sex wedding cake case ruling"
data-video-tags="belief, religion and spirituality,colorado,cooking and entertaining,food and drink,gays and lesbians,government and public administration,government bodies and offices,leisure and lifestyle,lgbt rights,marriage,north america,politics,population and demographics,same-sex marriage and unions,sex and gender issues,societal issues,society,southwestern united states,united states,us federal court system,us federal government,us supreme court,weddings and engagements"
data-details="">
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2018-06-04T14:16:05Z"
data-video-section="politics"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/06/04/supreme-court-undocumented-teen-abortion-schneider-lkl-nr.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="supreme court undocumented teen abortion schneider lkl nr"
data-first-publish-slug="supreme court undocumented teen abortion schneider lkl nr"
data-video-tags="abortion,donald trump,government and public administration,government bodies and offices,health and medical,jessica schneider,law and legal system,law courts and tribunals,medical treatments and procedures,north america,political figures - us,politics,population and demographics,sexual and reproductive health,society,southwestern united states,teenagers,texas,united states,us federal court system,us federal government,us supreme court,white house,decisions and rulings,trial and procedure"
data-details="">
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2016-10-28T20:42:10Z"
data-video-section="us"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2016/10/28/how-the-supreme-court-picks-cases.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="how the supreme court picks cases"
data-first-publish-slug="how the supreme court picks cases"
data-video-tags="government and public administration,government bodies and offices,law and legal system,politics,trial and procedure,us federal court system,us federal government,us supreme court"
data-details="">
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2017-06-26T15:09:46Z"
data-video-section="politics"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/06/26/supreme-court-allows-limited-version-travel-ban-schneider-nr.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="supreme court allows limited version travel ban schneider nr"
data-first-publish-slug="supreme court allows limited version travel ban schneider nr"
data-video-tags="donald trump,government and public administration,government bodies and offices,immigration,immigration politics,immigration, citizenship and displacement,international relations and national security,muslim people,national security,political figures - us,political platforms and issues,politics,population and demographics,refugees,society,trump travel ban,trump's first 100 days,us federal court system,us federal government,us supreme court,white house"
data-details="">
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2017-05-22T14:50:43Z"
data-video-section="us"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2017/05/22/supreme-court-strikes-down-nc-congressional-district-maps-nr.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="supreme court strikes down nc congressional district maps nr"
data-first-publish-slug="supreme court strikes down nc congressional district maps nr"
data-video-tags="constitutional law,elections and campaigns,electoral districts,government and public administration,government bodies and offices,law and legal system,north america,north carolina,politics,southeastern united states,united states,us federal court system,us federal government,us supreme court"
data-details="">
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2016-06-27T14:23:12Z"
data-video-section="politics"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/06/27/supreme-court-texas-abortion-decision-pamela-brown-lkl-nr.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="supreme court texas abortion decision pamela brown lkl nr"
data-first-publish-slug="supreme court texas abortion decision pamela brown lkl nr"
data-video-tags="abortion,constitutional law,decisions and rulings,government and public administration,government bodies and offices,health and medical,law and legal system,medical treatments and procedures,north america,politics,sexual and reproductive health,southwestern united states,state supreme court,texas,trial and procedure,united states,us federal court system,us federal government,us state governments,us supreme court"
data-details="">
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2016-06-23T14:29:05Z"
data-video-section="politics"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/06/23/supreme-court-upholds-affirmitive-action-nr.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="Supreme Court upholds affirmitive action nr"
data-first-publish-slug="Supreme Court upholds affirmitive action nr"
data-video-tags="affirmative action,college and university admissions,education,education systems and institutions,government and public administration,government bodies and offices,higher education,north america,politics,societal issues,society,southwestern united states,texas,united states,us federal court system,us federal government,us supreme court"
data-details="">
Video Ad Feedback
SCOTUS upholds university's affirmative action plan
- Source:
CNN
"
data-fave-thumbnails="{"big": { "uri": "https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/150626075312-02-scotus-same-sex-0626.jpg?q=x_3,y_327,h_1684,w_2993,c_crop/h_540,w_960" }, "small": { "uri": "https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/150626075312-02-scotus-same-sex-0626.jpg?q=x_3,y_327,h_1684,w_2993,c_crop/h_540,w_960" } }"
data-vr-video="false"
data-show-html=" State of the Union
"
data-byline-html="
"
data-timestamp-html="
Updated
2:35 PM EDT, Mon June 18, 2018
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2015-06-28T15:26:17Z"
data-video-section="tv"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/06/28/exp-sotu-panel-hugh-hewitt-jake-tapper-same-sex-marriage.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="exp SOTU PANEL Hugh Hewitt, Jake Tapper, Same-sex marriage"
data-first-publish-slug="exp SOTU PANEL Hugh Hewitt, Jake Tapper, Same-sex marriage"
data-video-tags="government and public administration,politics,us political parties,us republican party,constitutional law,decisions and rulings,gays and lesbians,government bodies and offices,law and legal system,lgbt rights,marriage,population and demographics,same-sex marriage and unions,sex and gender issues,societal issues,society,trial and procedure,us federal court system,us federal government,us supreme court"
data-details="">
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2015-06-29T15:06:46Z"
data-video-section="us"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2015/06/29/supreme-court-epa-clean-air-ruling-sot-nr-brown.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="supreme court epa clean air ruling sot nr brown"
data-first-publish-slug="supreme court epa clean air ruling sot nr brown"
data-video-tags="air pollution,air quality and air quality monitoring,air quality regulation,business and industry sectors,decisions and rulings,electricity production and distribution,emissions,energy and environment,energy and resource,energy and utilities,environment and natural resources,environmental cleanup and prevention,environmental law,environmental politics,environmental protection agency,environmental regulation and policy,government and public administration,government bodies and offices,industrial pollution,law and legal system,political platforms and issues,politics,pollution and environmental impacts,pollution monitoring,trial and procedure,us federal court system,us federal departments and agencies,us federal government,us government independent agencies,us supreme court,utilities industry,white house"
data-details="">
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2015-06-29T14:27:09Z"
data-video-section="us"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2015/06/29/supreme-court-lethal-injection-midazolam-sot-nr-brown.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="supreme court lethal injection midazolam sot nr brown"
data-first-publish-slug="supreme court lethal injection midazolam sot nr brown"
data-video-tags="capital punishment,crime, law enforcement and corrections,criminal law,decisions and rulings,government and public administration,government bodies and offices,law and legal system,politics,societal issues,society,trial and procedure,us federal court system,us federal government,us supreme court"
data-details="">
Video Ad Feedback
Supreme Court rules in favor of lethal injection drug
"
data-check-event-based-preview=""
data-is-vertical-video-embed="false"
data-network-id=""
data-publish-date="2015-06-29T14:52:19Z"
data-video-section="us"
data-canonical-url="https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2015/06/29/supreme-court-arizona-redistricting.cnn"
data-branding-key=""
data-video-slug="supreme court arizona redistricting"
data-first-publish-slug="supreme court arizona redistricting"
data-video-tags="constitutional law,decisions and rulings,environment and natural resources,environmental departments,environmental law,environmental protection agency,environmental regulation and policy,government and public administration,government bodies and offices,law and legal system,politics,trial and procedure,us federal court system,us federal departments and agencies,us federal government,us government independent agencies,us supreme court,arizona,elections and campaigns,electoral districts,legislative bodies,north america,southwestern united states,united states,us congress"
data-details="">
The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering, allowing controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm elections.
The 9-0 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in a Wisconsin case is a blow to Democrats who argued the Republican-drawn maps prevented fair and effective representation by diluting voters’ influence and penalizing voters based on their political beliefs.
While the ruling will let the maps be used, the justices dodged the question of whether they are legal. The Supreme Court has a standard limiting the overreliance on race in map-drawing, except under the most limited circumstances. The court has not been successful in developing a test concerning the overreliance on politics.
Democrats had won a challenge in a lower court, but the Supreme Court’s decision Monday would limit who can bring such cases in the future.
The second case was out of Maryland, where Republicans challenged a district map drawn by Democrats. The justices said that a lower court did not act improperly in leaving the map in place.
In an unsigned opinion with no dissents, the justices said that the challengers failed to reach the high bar of showing “irreparable harm” that would be necessary for a preliminary injunction to block the map.
“Even if we assume – contrary to the findings of the District Court – that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claims, the balance of equities and the public interest tilted against their request for a preliminary injunction,” the court said.
The court’s opinion in Maryland case means that for now the justices will leave having to answer whether the court can set a standard for when politicians go too far in drawing lines to benefit one party over another for another day.
Roberts sends Wisconsin to lower court
Roberts walked a fine line in his opinion in the Wisconsin case, finding the challengers did not have the legal right to bring the case.
Under normal circumstances, Roberts wrote, “we usually direct the dismissal” of the case. He added, “This is not the usual case.”
The court opted instead to send the case back to the lower court so the challengers might have another chance to “prove concrete and particularized injuries” by showing there had been a burden on their individual votes. That showing, in turn, would allow the challengers to proceed to the merits of the case.
That could be the reason Roberts got the liberals to sign on. Many believed the justices might use “standing” – or the legal right to bring a case – as an off ramp to avoid the merits in the case.
But few believed the opinion would be unanimous.
Roberts stressed that “we express no view on the merits of the plaintiffs’ case.” But he also cautioned that such challenges might be hard to bring down the road.
He noted that how the challengers bring these cases is key.
“It is a case about group political interests, not individual legal rights,” he wrote. “But the Court is not responsible for vindicating generalized partisan preferences. The Court’s constitutionally prescribed role is to vindicate the individual rights of the people before it.”
Liberals wanted court to act
While the liberals on the court agreed with the decision to send the Wisconsin case back down to the lower court, they emphasized that the court should someday take up such cases.
“Partisan gerrymandering no doubt burdens individual votes, but it also causes other harms,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote.
She called partisan gerrymandering “incompatible with democratic principles.”
There is a separate and similar challenge in the pipeline coming out of North Carolina, and the court could decide soon whether or not to hear that case.
“Courts – and in particular this court – will again be called on to redress extreme partisan gerrymanders,” Kagan wrote. “I am hopeful we will then step up to our responsibility to vindicate the Constitution against a contrary law.”
Elizabeth Wydra, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, told CNN that Kagan’s concurrence showed “the substantive battle over the constitutionality of partisan gerrymandering is far from over.”
Wydra said there does not appear to be five votes on the court to say definitively the courts must stay out of partisan gerrymandering.
Kennedy most silent
“Most likely Justice Kennedy’s vote is still in play when a case gets to the court with the right plaintiffs and the right theory of harm,” Wydra said. “And Kagan’s concurrence today makes a powerful case to Justice Kennedy that when that case comes, he should recognize that partisan gerrymandering is incompatible with the Constitution and democratic values.”
On Monday, Justice Anthony Kennedy stayed relatively silent. The last time the Supreme Court heard a major partisan gerrymandering case, in 2004, four conservative justices said the issue should be decided by the political branches, not the courts. But Kennedy was unwilling to bar all future claims of injury from partisan gerrymanders.
Before Monday’s decision, court watchers thought Kennedy might have found a standard that courts could use when deciding when states go too far in using politics to draw state lines. But not only did he refrain from writing separately, he also declined to join the concurring opinion put forward by the liberals.
Democrats, advocacy groups weigh in
After the ruling, Paul Smith, a lawyer for the challengers in the Wisconsin case, said “the case is very much still alive.”
“We now have the opportunity to demonstrate the real and concrete harms that result from partisan gerrymandering in the lower court, the same court that struck down the Wisconsin mapping scheme to begin with,” he said.
Wisconsin Democrats issued a statement via Twitter in response to the Supreme Court, vowing to continue their fight in face of the decision.
“The fight for fair maps did not end today,” the party’s statement read.
Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel issued a statement that touted the court’s decision but did not comment on the fact the court had sent the case back instead of dismissing it all together.
“I am pleased that the highest court in the land has unanimously reversed the trial court’s erroneous decision invalidating Wisconsin’s Assembly map,” Schimel, a Republican, said. “Today is win for the rule of law in Wisconsin, and a testament to the talented attorneys at the Wisconsin Department of Justice.”
Advocacy groups fighting against political gerrymandering likewise weighed in.
The American Civil Liberties Union called the Supreme Court’s punt on Monday a “missed opportunity,” although there are ongoing cases in Ohio and North Carolina.
And Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said the court “failed to provide long-awaited resolution and clarity on what constitutes unlawful gerrymandering.”
“As the case is now remanded to the district court for further development of the facts, we will remain vigilant to ensure that officials do not exploit this moment to alter redistricting maps in ways that undermine democracy,” Clarke said.